<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Algofreaks &#187; adwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.algofreaks.com/index.php/tag/adwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.algofreaks.com</link>
	<description>Freaking out on the Algorithm.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:34:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Using Misspellings in AdWords</title>
		<link>http://www.algofreaks.com/index.php/using-misspellings-in-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.algofreaks.com/index.php/using-misspellings-in-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kmcgovern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misspellings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likesocool.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had someone ask me about running a campaign of common misspellings for her keywords in AdWords and whether it was worth her time.  Well, the answer, as with most things, is &#8220;it depends.&#8221;  I used to always include a misspellings campaign for clients but haven&#8217;t bothered recently and here&#8217;s why.
If you&#8217;re running most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had someone ask me about running a campaign of common misspellings for her keywords in AdWords and whether it was worth her time.  Well, the answer, as with most things, is &#8220;it depends.&#8221;  I used to always include a misspellings campaign for clients but haven&#8217;t bothered recently and here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re running most of your keywords on broad match (don&#8217;t forget the negatives) then chances are you&#8217;re going to be showing for misspelled queries.  Google automatically corrects query spelling and shows results based on the correction.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you&#8217;re running everything on exact match then it may make sense to include some misspelled terms on exact match as well.</p>
<p>In addition, some people believe that overall quality score for the account can take a hit if you run misspellings because searchers generally won&#8217;t take action on a result for a misspelled query.  Despite the impression you may get, click-through rate goes down and so does your quality score.</p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s really up to the person running the campaign.  Does the audience require a little help to reach you? Is your product name hard to spell?  Try out some misspellings and see if they convert.  If they don&#8217;t, give them the boot quickly and spend your time on the optimizing and developing the keywords that do.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Using+Misspellings+in+AdWords+http://aarba.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.algofreaks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="[Post to Twitter]" border="0" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Using+Misspellings+in+AdWords+http://aarba.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a>&nbsp; </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.algofreaks.com/index.php/using-misspellings-in-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

